The Origin of Early Genesis- The Tablet Theory

The Documentary Hypothesis is a mess. The critical scholars are desperately ignoring the Tablet Theory

 

Did John Write the Gospel of John? The Narrow Circularity of Critical Scholarship

These people are willfully blind, and this is a good example of that blindness. 

 

Was God a Man in the Old Testament?

God became Man in the Incarnation, but the Incarnation seems to have been ordained from the foundation of the world. There is scripture to suggest that God the Son became man in some sense even back in the Old Testament. The Christ-centered model for early Genesis can make sense of this paradox. Link to Amazon page of Early Genesis the Revealed Cosmology. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB

 

Other People Survived the Flood of Noah

Mainstream theology teaches that the flood of Noah was global in extent, and drowned all humans on earth except for the eight souls on Noah's Ark. The English translations of scripture seem to support this doctrine, but the translations are wrong. See why a deeper and more Christ-centered look at the text supports the idea that the flood did not kill all people on earth, but was aimed at wiping out the line of Messiah. This video deals mostly with Genesis through the last part of change nine through chapter 11. Other videos cover other aspects of this question. Link to Amazon page of Early Genesis, the Revealed Cosmology. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB

 

After the Flood: Why Genesis 9 Supports a Local Flood

 

Did the RNA Vax Produce Negative Heritable Changes?

 The article by Tomislav Domazet-Lošo in Genes (MDPI, 2022) argues that mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines meets all structural criteria for retroposition via LINE-1 retrotransposons. It emphasizes that no experimental studies have ruled out genomic integration and calls for urgent research. The author suggests that if integration occurs in germline cells, heritable spike protein production is biologically plausible.

https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050719

Walter Doerfler’s article in Virus Research (2021) presents evidence that adenoviral DNA and SARS-CoV-2 RNA fragments can integrate into mammalian genomes. He discusses epigenetic consequences and the possibility of germline integration, though not proven. He calls for post-vaccination genomic surveillance and emphasizes that chance mechanisms in biology can lead to unexpected outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198466

The Authorea preprint by Kyriakopoulos, McCullough, Nigh, and Seneff (2022) expands on retroposition risks, arguing that vaccine mRNA is structurally compatible with genomic integration. It highlights the vulnerability of stem and germline cells and calls for toxicity evaluations. The authors suggest that heritable effects are possible and underexplored.
DOI: 10.22541/au.166203678.82079667/v1

The MDPI article in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2023) by Seneff, Nigh, Kyriakopoulos, and McCullough reviews potential risks of mRNA vaccines, including spike protein toxicity, immune dysregulation, and genomic integration. It discusses HLA disruption and autoimmune risks and calls for high-resolution molecular monitoring. The paper supports the plausibility of heritable spike production.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34872

The Journal of Precision Biosciences article (2025) by Rashid, Amin, Tufael, and Rahman argues that synthetic mRNA may embed into the human exome and interfere with transcription. It raises concerns about HLA scrambling, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. The authors advocate for ethical oversight and genomic safety studies, suggesting that

Genesis 7, The Tablet Theory, and a Local Flood