Two Atheist Scientists Convert to Christianity

 And they were saying some of the same things I have been saying. The one says that "Believing is seeing" to describe they way that people pick a view and then accumulate evidence to support it. The way I have been putting it is "All evidence is a mirror. It says as much about the viewer as the thing studied". We look at the same facts and draw different conclusions and that's why. The difference is not the evidence, its us!

The second fellow said that he studied the mind, and that naturalism can't explain the mind, nor can it explain physics. I've said the same thing myself in my book, and further speculated that as more and more evidence about biology is uncovered the failure of naturalism as an explanation will become more clear in that field as well. 

Read it all here. https://medium.com/top-down-or-bottom-up/two-former-atheist-scientists-explain-how-science-changed-their-minds-cc4535fcadd6