Thursday, March 10, 2022

Crisis in Particle Physics - Are they looking at this wrong?

 I really just want to start with a placeholder to this article talking about using "UV-MR interactions" to solve some of the thorny problems they have encountered in particle physics. This is not my speciality, but I have long wondered if they were looking at this wrong and that gravity could be unified with the EM force simply by looking at it as the "net change" from EM-force/ matter interactions at the smallest scales. Doing so has the potential to also solve the mystery of "Dark Matter" and maybe even "Dark Energy"  I am intrigued because a lot of what the article said dovetails well with some of my musings on the matter. 

I even wrote a bit about it, so long ago that I put in on my old Arkansas Politics blog where it was completely out of place. I do wish someone who is an expert in the field would take a look at it. To do so and give it a fair shot, they would need to approach it in a more open-minded manner and not reject it out of hand because of its simplicity yet in a way that was far out-of-whack with how they have been talking about these issues- until now apparently. 

I reproduce some of my pithy postulates which lead to my conclusions below, 


In a universe containing only two monopole particles of opposite charge, the force of gravity and the EM force are one and the same.


When an EM wave of high enough frequency to be resonant with the spin of a particle passes that particle, the particle’s motion is altered so as to maximize the EM force of attraction and minimize the EM force of repulsion during the interaction. I call this EM Wave-Particle Optimization.


During EM Wave-Particle Optimization the particle moves so that attractive forces increase while repulsive forces decrease. This results in a net attractive force for the event, which we call gravity.


Particles generate tiny EM waves as they spin, and the waves they generate are most ideal in form to maximize EM wave-particle optimization, unlike waves of longer wavelength, such as visible light.  Scientists should be looking at incredibly high frequencies for gravity waves, not just super low ones from black hole collisions. I am not convinced that the shock waves that they occasionally detect from colliding black holes is even a gravity wave.


In macro-scale objects, the gravity waves of their constituent atoms can resonate with one another to produce waves of increased (but still low) average amplitude (still at incredibly high frequency).



When a photon strikes a particle it produces a repulsive force. If the wavelength associated with  the photon is too large for EM wave-particle optimization to work efficiently then the repulsive force of light pressure is stronger than gravity within that EM-wave/photon system. This is known as radiation pressure.




Virtual matter pops in and out of existence, sometimes sending gravity waves out into the cosmos before they disappear. This helps makes some regions seem "heavier" than their regular matter can account for and makes up a component of "dark matter".

UPDATE: I note with interest this article which says they have observed matter being created from high-energy photons striking one another. IN this case an electron-positron pair which quickly annihilate each other. But I propose not before contributing a tiny amount of gravitational pull to the cosmos. 

Another update. Have they looked small enough and cold enough to see that gravity is a result of electromagnetic interactions with this experiment? What if an absence of heat allows virtual particles to pop into existence more easily and last longer? It would explain the "halo" of dark matter observed around galaxies. 

Another update: diffuse galaxies have more diffuse dark matter halos. Denser galaxies have dense dark matter halos. As would be the case if I am right. It isn't that dark matter doesn't have collisions, but they are not around long enough to have them often. The amount of dark matter is a function of the EM energy from a galaxy, especially at a range where the ultra-short wavelength waves can only constructively interfere because you are away from a galaxy's center where it is coming from all directions. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.